Fix a regression where the forced logout indicator was presented on the hidden overlay window. (#2063)

This commit is contained in:
Doug
2023-11-10 17:21:02 +00:00
committed by GitHub
parent 5adbb3789e
commit b5cc2cbf61
20 changed files with 88 additions and 17 deletions
@@ -49,13 +49,6 @@ class AppLockFlowCoordinator: CoordinatorProtocol {
// Set the initial background state.
showPlaceholder()
appLockService.disabledPublisher
.sink {
// When the service is disabled via a force logout, we need to remove the activity indicator.
ServiceLocator.shared.userIndicatorController.retractAllIndicators()
}
.store(in: &cancellables)
notificationCenter.publisher(for: UIApplication.didEnterBackgroundNotification)
.sink { [weak self] _ in
self?.applicationDidEnterBackground()
@@ -131,7 +124,6 @@ class AppLockFlowCoordinator: CoordinatorProtocol {
case .appUnlocked:
actionsSubject.send(.unlockApp)
case .forceLogout:
ServiceLocator.shared.userIndicatorController.submitIndicator(UserIndicator(type: .modal, title: L10n.commonSigningOut, persistent: true))
actionsSubject.send(.forceLogout)
}
}
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ struct AppLockScreenViewState: BindableState {
/// The number of times the user attempted to enter their PIN.
var numberOfPINAttempts = 0
/// An overlay indicator shown when the user is being logged out.
var forcedLogoutIndicator: UserIndicator?
var bindings: AppLockScreenViewStateBindings
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ class AppLockScreenViewModel: AppLockScreenViewModelType, AppLockScreenViewModel
state.bindings.alertInfo = .init(id: .confirmResetPIN,
title: L10n.screenAppLockSignoutAlertTitle,
message: L10n.screenAppLockSignoutAlertMessage,
primaryButton: .init(title: L10n.actionOk) { self.actionsSubject.send(.forceLogout) },
primaryButton: .init(title: L10n.actionOk) { self.forceLogout() },
secondaryButton: .init(title: L10n.actionCancel, role: .cancel, action: nil))
}
@@ -90,7 +90,12 @@ class AppLockScreenViewModel: AppLockScreenViewModelType, AppLockScreenViewModel
state.bindings.alertInfo = .init(id: .forcedLogout,
title: L10n.screenAppLockSignoutAlertTitle,
message: L10n.screenAppLockSignoutAlertMessage,
primaryButton: .init(title: L10n.actionOk) { self.actionsSubject.send(.forceLogout) })
primaryButton: .init(title: L10n.actionOk) { self.forceLogout() })
}
}
private func forceLogout() {
state.forcedLogoutIndicator = UserIndicator(type: .modal, title: L10n.commonSigningOut, persistent: true)
actionsSubject.send(.forceLogout)
}
}
@@ -58,6 +58,11 @@ struct AppLockScreen: View {
}
.background()
.environment(\.backgroundStyle, AnyShapeStyle(Color.compound.bgCanvasDefault))
.disabled(context.viewState.forcedLogoutIndicator != nil)
.overlay {
context.viewState.forcedLogoutIndicator.map(UserIndicatorModalView.init)
.animation(.elementDefault, value: context.viewState.forcedLogoutIndicator)
}
.alert(item: $context.alertInfo)
}
@@ -56,9 +56,6 @@ class AppLockService: AppLockServiceProtocol {
var numberOfPINAttempts: AnyPublisher<Int, Never> { appSettings.$appLockNumberOfPINAttempts }
private var disabledSubject: PassthroughSubject<Void, Never> = .init()
var disabledPublisher: AnyPublisher<Void, Never> { disabledSubject.eraseToAnyPublisher() }
init(keychainController: KeychainControllerProtocol, appSettings: AppSettings, context: LAContext = .init()) {
self.keychainController = keychainController
self.appSettings = appSettings
@@ -108,7 +105,6 @@ class AppLockService: AppLockServiceProtocol {
keychainController.removePINCode()
keychainController.removePINCodeBiometricState()
appSettings.appLockNumberOfPINAttempts = 0
disabledSubject.send()
}
func applicationDidEnterBackground() {
@@ -45,9 +45,6 @@ protocol AppLockServiceProtocol: AnyObject {
/// to re-enter their PIN code to re-enable the feature (i.e. to accept a new face or fingerprint).
var biometricUnlockTrusted: Bool { get }
/// A publisher that advertises when the service has been disabled.
var disabledPublisher: AnyPublisher<Void, Never> { get }
/// Sets the user's PIN code used to unlock the app.
func setupPINCode(_ pinCode: String) -> Result<Void, AppLockServiceError>
/// Validates the supplied PIN code is long enough, only contains digits and isn't a weak choice.